-
-
Recent Posts
- Nicholas Ridley, the Oxford martyr, is part of my family story
- In memory of J. I. Packer: A personal tribute
- Relating to people who identify as LGBT+, with grace and truth
- Free Will, Foreknowledge, and Necessity: Assessing an Incompatibilist Understanding
- Luke 23:34 and the salvation of the unevangelized
Recent Comments
- Kathleen Grace Hails on Nicholas Ridley, the Oxford martyr, is part of my family story
- Terrance Tiessen on A helpful resource on hypothetical universalism
- Michael hobbs on A helpful resource on hypothetical universalism
- Terrance Tiessen on Introducing Calvinism and Middle Knowledge: A Conversation
- Ron DiGiacomo on Introducing Calvinism and Middle Knowledge: A Conversation
- Terrance Tiessen on In memory of J. I. Packer: A personal tribute
- Terrance Tiessen on In memory of J. I. Packer: A personal tribute
- Jim Goswick on In memory of J. I. Packer: A personal tribute
Categories
Archives
Tag Cloud
accessibilism annihilationism Arminianism atonement autobiography baptism Calvinism coherence compatibilism conversion Daniel Strange death divine freedom election evangelism grace Gregory Boyd hell human freedom hypothetical knowledge incompatibilism Islam John Laing Michael Horton middle knowledge missions Molinism monergism N. T. Wright open theism original sin Paul Helseth prayer providence Robert Picirilli Roger Olson Ron Highfield salvation salvation of the unevangelized synergism theodicy Thomism traditionalism unevangelized William Lane CraigPages
Tag Archives: non-reductive materialism
Is it possible to give a biblically faithful account of human being which is substance monist?
Currently, I identify myself as a substance dualist who believes that humans are constituted of a material substance (body) and an immaterial substance (spirit), but I attempt to hold this view in a manner which does not diminish the great importance of the human body, and which emphasizes the wholeness of human being. I hold this position because it is what I have heard in the Bible, not because of the philosophical proposal of philosophers. … Continue reading