-
-
Recent Posts
- In memory of J. I. Packer: A personal tribute
- Relating to people who identify as LGBT+, with grace and truth
- Free Will, Foreknowledge, and Necessity: Assessing an Incompatibilist Understanding
- Luke 23:34 and the salvation of the unevangelized
- Introducing Calvinism and Middle Knowledge: A Conversation
Recent Comments
- Terrance Tiessen on Introducing Calvinism and Middle Knowledge: A Conversation
- Ron DiGiacomo on Introducing Calvinism and Middle Knowledge: A Conversation
- Terrance Tiessen on In memory of J. I. Packer: A personal tribute
- Terrance Tiessen on In memory of J. I. Packer: A personal tribute
- Jim Goswick on In memory of J. I. Packer: A personal tribute
- Ron Unruh on In memory of J. I. Packer: A personal tribute
- Terrance Tiessen on In memory of J. I. Packer: A personal tribute
- Reaksa Himm on In memory of J. I. Packer: A personal tribute
Categories
Archives
Tag Cloud
accessibilism annihilationism Arminianism atonement autobiography baptism Calvinism coherence compatibilism conversion Daniel Strange death divine freedom election evangelism grace Gregory Boyd hell human freedom hypothetical knowledge incompatibilism Islam John Laing Michael Horton middle knowledge missions Molinism monergism N. T. Wright open theism original sin Paul Helseth prayer providence Robert Picirilli Roger Olson Ron Highfield salvation salvation of the unevangelized synergism theodicy Thomism traditionalism unevangelized William Lane CraigPages
Tag Archives: open theism
Free Will, Foreknowledge, and Necessity: Assessing an Incompatibilist Understanding
I have been interacting with Robert Picirilli’s book, Free Will Revisited, which he wrote as a “respectful response to Luther, Calvin, and Edwards.” Those three representatives of a compatibilist perspective were selected because each of them wrote a book to argue for their position, against a prominent incompatibilist of their time. Martin Luther’s book, On the Bondage of the Will (1525), was his response to Desiderius Erasmus’s Diatribe on Free Will (1524). John Calvin wrote … Continue reading
Who wrote/writes the script for the drama, ”The History of the World”?
Recently, I’ve been doing a lot of reading and thinking about the nature of the freedom God gave to moral creatures, both angelic and human, and how this correlates with the degree of control which God has reserved to himself, within the history of the world. I thought it might be helpful to think of that history as a script, and to describe some of the key models of God’s providence in terms of different … Continue reading
Posted in Providence, Theology Proper
Tagged Arminianism, Calvinism, compatibilism, hypothetical knowledge, incompatibilism, Molinism, monergism, open theism, synergism
3 Comments
Revisiting free will, in conversation with Robert Picirilli (1)
A four-way conversation Among the theological decisions we must make if we are to have a theology and practice which both have an inner coherence, one of the most far reaching is our choice of model regarding God’s work in the world. How we understand the nature of the freedom God has given to his moral creatures is a key factor in that decision. This is a matter I have studied and ruminated about for … Continue reading
My compatibilist model: a response to some questions
John Johnson wrote a lengthy comment on my post responding to Jerry Walls and my compatibilist proposal. He raises some substantive questions and I think it better to deal with them in another post rather than to reply in a lengthy comment or a number of smaller comments. Because John’s questions are of a sort often raised to positions like mine, I think they deserve careful consideration. 1. If God is meticulously in control, why … Continue reading
Posted in Divine Knowledge, Providence, Theology Proper
Tagged Arminianism, Calvinism, compatibilism, hypothetical knowledge, John Johnson, Molinism, open theism, theodicy
3 Comments
Dallas Willard and open theism
I was saddened by the death of Dallas Willard at what looks like a relatively young age (77) from my present perspective. But he made a great contribution to the world during his life. I am one of the many who were informed, inspired, and challenged by his writings and by his godly example as a fine scholar, a brilliant teacher, and a faithful and humble follower of Jesus. As I have read tributes to Willard … Continue reading
Calvinism, Molinism, Arminianism, and Open Theism: monergism/synergism at the macro and micro levels.
Last November, I linked to a post by Roger Olson in which he accepted Open Theism as an option within Arminianism but rejected Molinism because he viewed it as a form of determinism. Initially, I agreed with Roger about Open Theism, but I disagreed with him about Molinism. After further thought, I proposed a more nuanced understanding, in which Arminianism, Open Theism, and Molinism are all distinct forms of synergism. Earlier this week, I mentioned … Continue reading
Posted in Theology Proper
Tagged Arminianism, Calvinism, Molinism, monergism, open theism, synergism
11 Comments
Responses to Boyd’s open theist model of providence
The questions that expose the incoherence of the neo-Molinist account of divine providence . . . establish that the God of open theism is an ambivalent and arbitrary warrior who cannot be trusted to rule in every situation in a way that minimizes evil and maximizes good for his creatures. (Helseth, 222) Molinism [handles the problem of evil better than open theism] for God permits horrible evils only in view of morally sufficient reasons, whereas … Continue reading
Posted in Books, Providence
Tagged Calvinism, compatibilism, Gregory Boyd, hypothetical knowledge, Molinism, open theism, Paul Helseth, Ron Highfield, William Lane Craig
2 Comments
Boyd’s open theist model of providence
We come now to the fourth model in Four Views on Divine Providence, as Gregory Boyd puts forward his understanding as an open theist. Gregory A. Boyd’s model of providence Christocentric criteria proposed for assessing models of divine providence Boyd posits that Jesus is the key to understanding the nature of God’s governance in the world and so he identifies four christocentric criteria by which models of providence should … Continue reading
Posted in Books, Providence, Theology Proper
Tagged Arminianism, Calvinism, Gregory Boyd, human freedom, hypothetical knowledge, Molinism, open theism
Leave a comment
Further thoughts concerning Molinism and Arminianism
A few days ago, I responded to Roger Olson’s opinion that Open Theism is a form of Arminianism but Molinism is not. I’ll wrap that conversation up with these citations of our further conversation in the comment thread of Roger’s post, particularly regarding Molinism. Roger wrote: Thanks, Terry. I don’t consider Greg Boyd a Molinist. His “might counterfactuals” are not at all what traditional Molinism/middle knowledge claims. His “neo-Molinism” is not, IMHO, any version of … Continue reading
Posted in Theology - General
Tagged Arminianism, Bruce Ware, Gregory Boyd, Molinism, open theism, Roger Olson
3 Comments
Are open theism and Molinism forms of Arminian theology?
Roger Olson has addressed an interesting question: are open theism and Molinism forms of Arminianism or not? He thinks that open theism is but Molinism is not. I agree with Roger Olson that open theism is a sub-category of Arminian theology but I disagree with his assessment that Molinism does not belong there. Here is the slightly edited comment I wrote on his blog post (though it has not yet been approved there). I speak … Continue reading