-
-
Recent Posts
- Revisiting free will, in conversation with Robert Picirilli (1)
- Why is God’s knowledge of counterfactuals valuable to a compatibilist doctrine of providence?
- William Lane Craig now affirms universal revelation accessibilism
- When you make a decision, what do you actually change?
- Pope Francis on the nature of Hell
Recent Comments
- Baptist Joshua on YouTube on “Four-point” and “five-point” Calvinism defined
- Brad Rininger on “Four-point” and “five-point” Calvinism defined
- D. Andrew White on Is the theory of evolution compatible with theism?
- Richie on The distinction between Reformed Arminians and Wesleyan Arminians
- D. Randall on William Lane Craig now affirms universal revelation accessibilism
- Terrance Tiessen on The distinction between Reformed Arminians and Wesleyan Arminians
- Richie on The distinction between Reformed Arminians and Wesleyan Arminians
- Dwight on Should local churches be autonomous?
Categories
Archives
Tag Cloud
accessibilism annihilationism Arminianism atonement autobiography baptism Calvinism coherence compatibilism conversion Daniel Strange death divine freedom election evangelicalism gospel exclusivism grace Gregory Boyd hell human freedom hypothetical knowledge incarnation Islam John Laing Michael Horton missions Molinism monergism N. T. Wright open theism original sin Paul Helseth prayer providence Roger Olson Ron Highfield salvation salvation of the unevangelized synergism theodicy Thomism traditionalism unevangelized union with Christ William Lane CraigPages
Tag Archives: unevangelized
Peter Kreeft’s accessibilist perspective re: the unevangelized
In Tough Questions Christians Ask, published by Christianity Today in 1989 and then reprinted as a web only article in 2003, Peter Kreeft answers 35 questions about eternity, mostly with regard to heaven. (The few questions about hell are answered interestingly, but it is difficult to tell from those answers alone whether or not Kreeft affirms annihilationism.) In general, I find his answers astute and helpful, particularly his willingness to grant that there is much we … Continue reading
Posted in Roman Catholicism, Soteriology
Tagged accessibilism, baptism, Peter Kreeft, unevangelized
2 Comments
William Lane Craig affirms universal revelation accessibilism
“Salvation is truly available to all persons at all times. It all depends upon our free response.” W. L. Craig For years, I have been aware of a gospel exclusivist approach to the salvation of the unevangelized, formulated within a Molinist framework, and enunciated very clearly by William Lane Craig. In a number of publications, I have seen him argue that God has chosen a world in which everyone who would have believed the gospel, if … Continue reading
The exclusivity of Christ and a Christian theology of religions
The western world is increasingly diverse religiously, and so it has become more urgent that we have a well formulated understanding of how we should view and relate to the religions of the world and their adherents. This fact has not escaped the attention of either theologians or missiologists, so books have addressed it from various Christian perspectives. Todd Miles has come at the subject as an evangelical with … Continue reading
Posted in Books, Soteriology, Theology of religions
Tagged accessibilism, gospel exclusivism, Todd Miles, unevangelized
Leave a comment
D’ Costa’s critique of Strange’s subversive fulfilment interpretation of other religions
Dialogue between Gavin D’Costa and Daniel Strange D’Costa’s response to Strange’s position Gavin D’Costa begins his response to Daniel Strange’s subversive fulfilment approach by enumerating numerous foundational points of agreement, but he is conscious of a Calvinist-Catholic divide that is daunting (145-46). Among points of difference which D’Costa attributes to this divide are: Dan’s rejection of the concept of “invincible ignorance,” which arose within Catholic theology in the 16th century and was particularly emphasized in … Continue reading
Posted in Books, Theology of religions
Tagged Daniel Strange, Gavin D' Costa, post-mortem salvation, unevangelized
Leave a comment
Knitter’s critique of Strange’s subversive fulfilment interpretation of other religions
Dialogue between Paul Knitter and Daniel Strange The largest distance between perspectives in this book exists between Paul Knitter’s unitive pluralist approach and Daniel Strange’s subversive fulfilment approach, so we will begin with their conversation and then take up D`Costa`s critique in another post. Knitter’s response to Strange Paul Knitter chose to focus on what he believes are dangers in Dan’s arguments, namely, the elements that can be harmful – to “the individual Christian … Continue reading
Posted in Books, Theology of religions
Tagged accessibilism, Daniel Strange, Paul Knitter, unevangelized
2 Comments
A “subversive fulfilment” interpretation of other religions
Daniel Strange gives a third Christian perspective on other religions, in chapter 3 of Only One Way? Three Christian Responses to the Uniqueness of Christ in a Pluralistic World. Daniel Strange’s proposal Since Dan is the only one of the three authors whom I know personally, I am going to switch to referring to him that way in this section dealing with his material. Calling him “Strange” sounds a bit too distant for my … Continue reading
Posted in Books, Theology of religions
Tagged Daniel Strange, salvation, unevangelized
Leave a comment
Conversation about D’ Costa’s fulfillment approach
Paul Knitter’s response to D’ Costa Knitter responds to Gavin D’ Costa as a fellow Catholic and a friend, but he asserts that D’ Costa is wrong on a number of critical points: D’ Costa thinks tradition to be “like a wise man living through the centuries, learning to adjust and speak different languages as times and cultures change,” whereas Knitter images it as “a couple procreating new embodiments of truth and so producing a … Continue reading
Posted in Books, Theology of religions
Tagged accessibilism, Daniel Strange, Gavin D' Costa, Paul Knitter, post-mortem salvation, salvation, unevangelized
2 Comments
A “fulfillment” approach to other religions
The proper Christian approach and attitude to other religions and their adherents is not a new issue for Christianity. The church of the second century faced it squarely. But the ease of world travel, and the increasing diversity of the population in western nations, have made this a pressing issue for us in our time. Not all Christian theologians agree on the correct answers, and so we need a constructive conversation about this, within the … Continue reading
Accessibilism and missionary motivation
Gospel exclusivists frequently express grave concern that, if Christians were to believe that God saves some people who do not hear the gospel from a human messenger, they would become unwilling to make the costly sacrifice that the missionary mandate requires of Jesus’ followers. Since reaching accessibilist convictions myself, I have taken that concern seriously because I would be extremely sorry if I contributed to any diminishment of the church’s commitment to global evangelism. Growing … Continue reading